I just finished delivering my umpteenth Project Management course at The University of Akron. I'm not 100% sure but I think this one edged me well beyond the 200th professional development course for the new millennium.
This particular class was a pretty good bunch - 19 individuals; mostly adult learners; about half of the group possessed a pretty good project management background; about half of the rest had virtually no project background; and the remaining handful varied in experience. These folks pushed my delivery techniques up about six notches beyond the normal course composition due to their widely varied experience and relative interest. But... I think I hurt their feelings. Here's why.
I've been noticing for nearly a decade that students are becoming more and more attracted to PowerPoint list presentations and almost frighteningly addicted to PowerPoint Handouts. (You know? That stack of 3 to a page images of my presentation slides along with lines to take notes) A significant part of the perception seems to be that, if you do not present using PowerPoint (or one of its little brothers), you do not know how to teach (I'll get to this in another post). Even more chilling is the attitude that, if you don't hand out detailed notes pages (based on your PowerPoint) you are doing something wrong. (That's what I want to cover here.)
Well, (OOPS...) My PowerPoints display minimal information and (GASP...) I don't like PowerPoint handout stacks. Here's why...
When I deliver a course that includes PowerPoint handouts, I consistently notice that the students don't take their own notes. Why should they? I've already written out all the information for them in the handouts. I've also noted, again consistently, that when I ask questions in the presence of handouts, students can't seem to respond with their own unique thoughts. Instead they fire back answers based on simply looking at the following slides in the handout stack. Easy as pie to learn when you need not think your own thoughts and you can peek ahead to see the line of discussion. The amount of learning going on in these scenarios is more closely focused on telling me what they think I want to hear than on what's genuinely in their heads.
On the other hand, when I teach without benefit of the PowerPoint handouts, students write voluminous notes. They also ask unique questions and respond to mine with answers from their own perspectives - their own experiences. They process what they're learning and apply it to their own realities. Learning genuinely happens in these classrooms and everyone benefits. In this environment, not only do the students stay mentally alert but they frequently pull me up to new perspectives and enable me to answer more complex questions while building new ideas into the next course.
So... I'm torn. Deliver courses with PowerPoint handouts or leave the handouts off the resource list? In terms of learning theory I know students retain more information longer when they have to listen and transfer the concepts in their minds into their own handwriting and jot them down. Involving the optimal number of senses in the delivery is without a doubt the way to go to deliver value. However, there are two interesting problems with all this: First - Students who have grown used to the PowerPoint experience will hammer the instructor on the evaluations if they don't get their handouts. Second - The university departments for which I've worked become upset when instructors don't deliver those vital handouts to students.
Lately I've been consuming the fruit punch and handing students the PowerPoint slide deck pages for their notes and my evaluations are way up but I'm not comfortable with the learning. Interesting dichotomy...
I was once told the my "altruism was going to get me fired." The speaker was an academic dean in a career position that I absolutely loved - teaching at a university that really needed what I had to offer. Unfortunately, I had purpose and ethics and felt that the knowledge delivered to my students was the most important value I could deliver to the enterprise. (In this case, I spoke out against grade inflation; a new football program that sacrificed academics in favor of attracting athletic numbers; and an apathetic tenured faculty.)
Shortly there-after, I discovered that my entire portfolio of highly specialized intellectual property (I had developed four unique courses and programs, three of which were part of the required curriculum.) had been absorbed by, was now "owned" by the enterprise and I found myself out of a job/career. As a contract employee I was completely disposable once the enterprise sucked me dry - or anytime I disagreed with anything that conflicted with the latest politically correct concept or propagandized belief.
Not only was I "removed" but I was completely and carefully ostracized from the entire campus community (people I thought of as friends). I never heard from any of my fellow faculty members again. Interestingly enough, since I was also pretty popular with students, I was quietly disposed of after they had all left for summer break. (Several of them hunted me down and we still connect now and then.)
I'm 57 years old and have been searching for an enterprise that valued my knowledge, skills, and capabilities, and one that was willing to allow me to fully apply them to a purpose larger than myself. Essentially, all I've wanted was a place where I could thrive and contribute to a community of value - to be considered something more than a piece of employment meat. What I have found is a long succession of the same old same old - enterprises operated by executive management according to what's minimally legal and who have carefully crafted the personnel and operational infrastructure to ensure they are never put at risk by individuals more capable than themselves.
I have been watching this mentality literally destroy my country and it is one of THE most significant disappointments in my life. Nearly a decade ago, I founded an organization that I thought would move beyond the petty scrabbling of personal greed into a valuable service arena - only to discover that management had once again ensured its own plush lifestyle and, once sucked dry, I was no longer welcome. Once again - I became ostracized and cut off from my community of friends. (Out of over two hundred, only eight continue to communicate with me.)
To be truly human is to reach out beyond our own needs and greeds. Anything less is the function of chaos. If the enterprise wants innovation it must be compelled to nurture and reward those who innovate, not drain them and return the empties for new models. When employee loyalty is rewarded with disloyal actions on the part of the employer, nobody wins. There IS no possibility of win-win when one party is abused by the other.
I have never spoken these thoughts or attitudes out loud but I honestly believe that if we expect to turn this country of ours away from the self-centered - self-righteous - corporate mind-set we need to take our country back from that corporate mind set. As long as what is legal trumps what is right, we are doomed to continue to slide down a very slippery slope into a very nasty place. As long as the needs of the shareholders and the image of executive management trump the lives of the employees who shed the blood, sweat, and tears to put the company into its current successful position, we are NOT going to succeed.
This isn't to suggest that ALL corporations are wrong - plenty of them still value the employees that made them great. Unfortunately, there are way too many enterprises that exist solely (or is that soul-lessly?) for the good of the company instead of the good of the community.
I'm an American - not Italian American; not Irish American; not Latin American; not any other "dash" American. My concern is that, in this disposable employee mentality, we just may be seeing a seriously deadly change in the value of American lives - one that could put us - the BIG US - quite literally out of business. I don't expect, nor am I asking for, anyone to follow me into any mythical promised land. What I do expect is for people to start voting with their feet and start speaking out when others begin destroying the foundational beliefs and culture that define our families, our companies, our countries and our world. If we don't get out of our apathetic little clouds, we're all going to discover that what has been done to destroy the trust of the individual employee has also been done to destroy all our hopes for a decent future for our children.
And, yes. I've decided to remain altruistic - look for it on my business card. The alternatives - the ones we're seeing now: economically, politically, and all-too-frequently right here in our homes - simply suck.